@abcoathup … notified as he normally knows everything 
I find Remix and Etherscan very useful as they autogenerate a UI to test a smart contract , without any need to develop something.
However, Remix is too manually the more complex a project gets, and I may not want to deploy the contract to a testnet with the need for code upload and verification on etherscan.
Is there some local, development tool which could provide that ?
Hi @sven.meyer,
You could look at oneclickdapp.com.
I have previously used udapp.
You could also try: eth95.dev (I haven’t used it but I like the retro style)
@abcoathup thanks a lot - both look great. I have not heard of any of them ! Will try them out right away …
I can’y see any option to choose the network for upapp. Does it only work for mainnet? Local network would be great to have for development !
Hi @sven.meyer,
uDapp uses MetaMask, you will need to manually connect. So should even work with locally deployed contracts.
@abcoathup great … too easy … if it works like it should ideally.
Thanks for pointing that out !
Hi @sven.meyer,
I also added: https://eth95.dev/
I noticed when using udapp (which I really like because by just providing a ABI and can generate a link with a UI) to call a view function, that it displays the result, but still Metamask pops up, and asks for a confirmation as if I would want to call a transaction?
Anything what could be wrong on my side ?
Hi @sven.meyer,
It looks like udapp is trying to send a transaction for view/pure functions. This may not be an issue for testnets.
The repository is https://github.com/kumavis/udapp
Kumavis is part of the team at MetaMask.