// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity >=0.4.0 <0.9.0;
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Context.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Address.sol";
import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol";
contract REFLECT is Context, IERC20, Ownable {
using SafeMath for uint256;
using Address for address;
mapping (address => uint256) private _rOwned;
mapping (address => uint256) private _tOwned;
mapping (address => mapping (address => uint256)) private _allowances;
mapping (address => bool) private _isExcluded;
// Who should be excluded?
address[] private _excluded;
// This line does not make sense to me
uint256 private constant MAX = ~uint256(0);
// Set to 1 trillion 10000 * 10**9 * 10**9
uint256 private constant _tTotal = 10 * 10**6 * 10**9;
uint256 private _rTotal = (MAX - (MAX % _tTotal));
uint256 private _tFeeTotal;
// Change name, symbol and decimal
string private _name = 'reflect.finance';
string private _symbol = 'RFI';
uint8 private _decimals = 9;
constructor () public {
// Does this line allocate all the reward tokens to the deployer?
_rOwned[_msgSender()] = _rTotal;
// Why does he emit an event about all the tokens in supply being transferred to the owner without any line doing so, did i miss something?
emit Transfer(address(0), _msgSender(), _tTotal);
}
function name() public view returns (string memory) {
return _name;
}
function symbol() public view returns (string memory) {
return _symbol;
}
function decimals() public view returns (uint8) {
return _decimals;
}
function totalSupply() public view override returns (uint256) {
return _tTotal;
}
function balanceOf(address account) public view override returns (uint256) {
// tokenFromReflection - what do you do?
if (_isExcluded[account]) return _tOwned[account];
return tokenFromReflection(_rOwned[account]);
}
function transfer(address recipient, uint256 amount) public override returns (bool) {
_transfer(_msgSender(), recipient, amount);
return true;
}
function allowance(address owner, address spender) public view override returns (uint256) {
return _allowances[owner][spender];
}
function approve(address spender, uint256 amount) public override returns (bool) {
_approve(_msgSender(), spender, amount);
return true;
}
function transferFrom(address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount) public override returns (bool) {
_transfer(sender, recipient, amount);
_approve(sender, _msgSender(), _allowances[sender][_msgSender()].sub(amount, "ERC20: transfer amount exceeds allowance"));
return true;
}
function increaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 addedValue) public virtual returns (bool) {
_approve(_msgSender(), spender, _allowances[_msgSender()][spender].add(addedValue));
return true;
}
function decreaseAllowance(address spender, uint256 subtractedValue) public virtual returns (bool) {
_approve(_msgSender(), spender, _allowances[_msgSender()][spender].sub(subtractedValue, "ERC20: decreased allowance below zero"));
return true;
}
function isExcluded(address account) public view returns (bool) {
return _isExcluded[account];
}
function totalFees() public view returns (uint256) {
return _tFeeTotal;
}
// sender is not specified anywhere in this code. Oh i've seen why.
// TODO READ ABOUT OWNABLE
// So this function burns reward tokens then adds them to the fees?
function reflect(uint256 tAmount) public {
address sender = _msgSender();
// Why can't excluded addresses use this function, i guess you have to know what it does first
require(!_isExcluded[sender], "Excluded addresses cannot call this function");
// The excessive use of comas, is that solidty syntax or effects from a high dev
// So the reason for the excessive commas is because this function returns five uints and were extracting only one
// I'm guessing what this line does is get the reward amount from the token amount
(uint256 rAmount,,,,) = _getValues(tAmount);
// Okay so we're removing the reward tokens this address has
_rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount);
// Subtracting the total reward tokens
_rTotal = _rTotal.sub(rAmount);
// hmmm
_tFeeTotal = _tFeeTotal.add(tAmount);
}
function reflectionFromToken(uint256 tAmount, bool deductTransferFee) public view returns(uint256) {
require(tAmount <= _tTotal, "Amount must be less than supply");
if (!deductTransferFee) {
(uint256 rAmount,,,,) = _getValues(tAmount);
return rAmount;
} else {
(,uint256 rTransferAmount,,,) = _getValues(tAmount);
return rTransferAmount;
}
}
// here
function tokenFromReflection(uint256 rAmount) public view returns(uint256) {
require(rAmount <= _rTotal, "Amount must be less than total reflections");
uint256 currentRate = _getRate();
return rAmount.div(currentRate);
}
function excludeAccount(address account) external onlyOwner() {
require(!_isExcluded[account], "Account is already excluded");
if(_rOwned[account] > 0) {
_tOwned[account] = tokenFromReflection(_rOwned[account]);
}
_isExcluded[account] = true;
_excluded.push(account);
}
function includeAccount(address account) external onlyOwner() {
require(_isExcluded[account], "Account is already excluded");
for (uint256 i = 0; i < _excluded.length; i++) {
if (_excluded[i] == account) {
_excluded[i] = _excluded[_excluded.length - 1];
_tOwned[account] = 0;
_isExcluded[account] = false;
_excluded.pop();
break;
}
}
}
function _approve(address owner, address spender, uint256 amount) private {
require(owner != address(0), "ERC20: approve from the zero address");
require(spender != address(0), "ERC20: approve to the zero address");
_allowances[owner][spender] = amount;
emit Approval(owner, spender, amount);
}
function _transfer(address sender, address recipient, uint256 amount) private {
require(sender != address(0), "ERC20: transfer from the zero address");
require(recipient != address(0), "ERC20: transfer to the zero address");
require(amount > 0, "Transfer amount must be greater than zero");
if (_isExcluded[sender] && !_isExcluded[recipient]) {
_transferFromExcluded(sender, recipient, amount);
} else if (!_isExcluded[sender] && _isExcluded[recipient]) {
_transferToExcluded(sender, recipient, amount);
} else if (!_isExcluded[sender] && !_isExcluded[recipient]) {
_transferStandard(sender, recipient, amount);
} else if (_isExcluded[sender] && _isExcluded[recipient]) {
_transferBothExcluded(sender, recipient, amount);
} else {
_transferStandard(sender, recipient, amount);
}
}
function _transferStandard(address sender, address recipient, uint256 tAmount) private {
(uint256 rAmount, uint256 rTransferAmount, uint256 rFee, uint256 tTransferAmount, uint256 tFee) = _getValues(tAmount);
_rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount);
_rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount);
_reflectFee(rFee, tFee);
emit Transfer(sender, recipient, tTransferAmount);
}
function _transferToExcluded(address sender, address recipient, uint256 tAmount) private {
(uint256 rAmount, uint256 rTransferAmount, uint256 rFee, uint256 tTransferAmount, uint256 tFee) = _getValues(tAmount);
_rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount);
_tOwned[recipient] = _tOwned[recipient].add(tTransferAmount);
_rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount);
_reflectFee(rFee, tFee);
emit Transfer(sender, recipient, tTransferAmount);
}
function _transferFromExcluded(address sender, address recipient, uint256 tAmount) private {
(uint256 rAmount, uint256 rTransferAmount, uint256 rFee, uint256 tTransferAmount, uint256 tFee) = _getValues(tAmount);
_tOwned[sender] = _tOwned[sender].sub(tAmount);
_rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount);
_rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount);
_reflectFee(rFee, tFee);
emit Transfer(sender, recipient, tTransferAmount);
}
function _transferBothExcluded(address sender, address recipient, uint256 tAmount) private {
(uint256 rAmount, uint256 rTransferAmount, uint256 rFee, uint256 tTransferAmount, uint256 tFee) = _getValues(tAmount);
_tOwned[sender] = _tOwned[sender].sub(tAmount);
_rOwned[sender] = _rOwned[sender].sub(rAmount);
_tOwned[recipient] = _tOwned[recipient].add(tTransferAmount);
_rOwned[recipient] = _rOwned[recipient].add(rTransferAmount);
_reflectFee(rFee, tFee);
emit Transfer(sender, recipient, tTransferAmount);
}
function _reflectFee(uint256 rFee, uint256 tFee) private {
_rTotal = _rTotal.sub(rFee);
_tFeeTotal = _tFeeTotal.add(tFee);
}
function _getValues(uint256 tAmount) private view returns (uint256, uint256, uint256, uint256, uint256) {
(uint256 tTransferAmount, uint256 tFee) = _getTValues(tAmount);
uint256 currentRate = _getRate();
(uint256 rAmount, uint256 rTransferAmount, uint256 rFee) = _getRValues(tAmount, tFee, currentRate);
return (rAmount, rTransferAmount, rFee, tTransferAmount, tFee);
}
function _getTValues(uint256 tAmount) private pure returns (uint256, uint256) {
uint256 tFee = tAmount.div(100);
uint256 tTransferAmount = tAmount.sub(tFee);
return (tTransferAmount, tFee);
}
function _getRValues(uint256 tAmount, uint256 tFee, uint256 currentRate) private pure returns (uint256, uint256, uint256) {
uint256 rAmount = tAmount.mul(currentRate);
uint256 rFee = tFee.mul(currentRate);
uint256 rTransferAmount = rAmount.sub(rFee);
return (rAmount, rTransferAmount, rFee);
}
function _getRate() private view returns(uint256) {
(uint256 rSupply, uint256 tSupply) = _getCurrentSupply();
return rSupply.div(tSupply);
}
function _getCurrentSupply() private view returns(uint256, uint256) {
uint256 rSupply = _rTotal;
uint256 tSupply = _tTotal;
for (uint256 i = 0; i < _excluded.length; i++) {
if (_rOwned[_excluded[i]] > rSupply || _tOwned[_excluded[i]] > tSupply) return (_rTotal, _tTotal);
rSupply = rSupply.sub(_rOwned[_excluded[i]]);
tSupply = tSupply.sub(_tOwned[_excluded[i]]);
}
if (rSupply < _rTotal.div(_tTotal)) return (_rTotal, _tTotal);
return (rSupply, tSupply);
}
}
Hey @winnieot
for personal experience I suggest to avoid a token with rfi + dividends
It require a huge gas, so or the transaction fail, or the users will pay more for a transaction than their rewards.
Also, if you have reflection you should update the dividend balance at each balance change. This is near to impossible for gas issues
Hi @FreezyEx, I have been trying to reach you personally but I was unable to get to you. Can I message you to discuss the project?
Is there an alternative you can suggest? @freezyEx
You should choose one between reflection and dividend
Thank you very much, I hope you don't mind if I have your WhatsApp contact