Help understanding contract Context

Hi! I’m new learning solidity, I noticie a common contract call Context in lot of tokens. Here it is:

// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT

pragma solidity ^0.8.0;

/*
 * @dev Provides information about the current execution context, including the
 * sender of the transaction and its data. While these are generally available
 * via msg.sender and msg.data, they should not be accessed in such a direct
 * manner, since when dealing with meta-transactions the account sending and
 * paying for execution may not be the actual sender (as far as an application
 * is concerned).
 *
 * This contract is only required for intermediate, library-like contracts.
 */
abstract contract Context {
    function _msgSender() internal view virtual returns (address) {
        return msg.sender;
    }

    function _msgData() internal view virtual returns (bytes calldata) {
        return msg.data;
    }
}

I don’t understand how exactly this contract make a token more secure. When I call a function to one contract A, this contract may call another function in other contract B, so msg.sender will be this contract. But in this case, msg.sender = _msgSender() = contractA_address

So how this exactly provide more security? I don’t get, maybe if someone could give me an example I may understand it

This doesn’t by itself provide any more security.

When using a meta-transaction solution such as EIP-2771, msg.sender will be a forwarder account, and the “real” message sender has to be retrieved through other means:

Using Context and _msgSender allows you to correctly retrieve the “real” message sender in this context.

You don’t need to worry about it if you’re not planning to use meta transactions like this.

could you explain, how is it differ from msg.sender ?

You can use a variant of Context such as ERC2771Context that implements _msgSender with different logic: