PreciousChickenToken: A guided example of OpenZeppelin's ERC20 using Ethers, Truffle and React

I really appreciate your reply; wasn't expecting you to go into such depth, but it is good of you to take the time. I hope you had a good vacation (and managed to get up to some nice stuff despite the pandemic).

I've altered a fair bit of my post in line with your suggestions, so will give feedback on your feedback :grinning::

I noticed that you installed truffle globally, my personal preference is Installing packages locally rather than globally (npx)

Same here. I prefer local installs, much neater. However the audience for this post is very much beginner - therefore they should follow all the instructions and it should hopefully work first time. However it they've followed the official truffle install guide previously, which is entirely possible; then installing via npx on top of a global install might cause problems. In which case they'd need to uninstall globally before installing again with npx. And that's just too much blurb. On the other hand if they've previously installed globally, and just do it again using my instructions, it should still work.

I would keep any non-core functionality separate from the token (such as purchasing). The token should ideally just be the functionality to use the token. If you have purchasing functionality you can put this in a separate contract.

You could also transfer an amount of tokens to the purchasing functionality contract rather than having to set an allowance for the token contract to be able to use some of the deployer of the token contracts tokens.

This would be a definite improvement. I've copied this advice into the conclusion section and linked to your post, in case people are using my guide as a jumping off point.

The pragma could be ^0.6.2 as 0.6.2 is the minimum compiler version that we can use due to dependencies in OpenZeppelin Contracts.

I think I previously referred to 0.6.0 in some places, and 0.6.1 in others, so I've made them all 0.6.2; thanks for pointing this out.

There is a typo in the SPDX license: The Unlicense (MIT is a great license to use).

Embarrassing - no idea how I achieved this as the compiler would have thrown this out :thinking:. Either way, corrected, thanks for flagging.

I know that you are aware that you didn’t handle decimals. The token has 18 decimals. You could change this to have 0 decimals.

Done, thanks for suggestion.

Rather than changing the build artifacts to client/src/contracts you could create a soft link. ( ln -s ../../build/contracts/ contracts )

You could argue a soft link is more elegant. However the advantage of building it in the client directory is if you deploy anywhere other than locally (e.g. Vercel) you are going to want the build products in the same folder as React. One of the nice things about writing a blog is your code examples serve as templates for you later, and I'm interested in deploying smart contracts other than locally. However I've included the option in the explanation anyway so people can do either.

I also made a fairly major change unrelated to the ERC20; I figured out how to get Metamask to connect to the React app without all the localhost configuration; so it should be more seamless for people following the guide.

Anyway I really do appreciate your guidance, it is very good of you to take the time to offer such great suggestions.

1 Like